Man sues Nirvana over naked baby pic used on album cover, cites 'child sexual exploitation'

26 August 2021 - 12:36 By Jan Wolfe
Spencer Elden is suing Nirvana over a naked image of him used on their best-selling album. File photo.
Spencer Elden is suing Nirvana over a naked image of him used on their best-selling album. File photo.
Image: 123RF/3Drenderings

A man who appeared as a naked baby on the cover of Nirvana's 1991 Nevermind album has filed a lawsuit against the surviving members of the influential band, alleging the image was child sexual exploitation.

In a lawsuit filed in federal court in California, Spencer Elden alleged he has suffered lifelong damages from the image used on the album's cover, which depicted him swimming naked towards a dollar bill pierced with a fish hook.

Nevermind is one of the best-selling albums of all time, having sold more than 30-million copies worldwide.

“Defendants intentionally commercially marketed Spencer’s child pornography and leveraged the shocking nature of his image to promote themselves and their music at his expense,” it was alleged in the lawsuit, which was filed on Tuesday.

Elden, now 30, is asking for $150,000 (about R2.2m) in compensation from each of several defendants, including Universal Music Group, photographer Kirk Weddle, Nirvana drummer and rock legend Dave Grohl, Nirvana bassist Krist Novoselic and Courtney Love, the widow of Nirvana's lead singer Kurt Cobain, who died in 1994.

Universal Music Group, Weddle and a publicist for Love did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

According to the lawsuit, Elden's parents never received any compensation for the image shot by Weddle, who was a friend of Elden's father.

The lawsuit alleged Cobain initially agreed to have a sticker censor Elden's genitals on the album cover, but no stickers were used.

Elden recreated the image as an adult in 2016, and has Nevermind tattooed on his chest.

Weddle told the Guardian in 2019 that he was still in contact with Elden.

Weddle told the publication: “I used to think, ‘Man, when that kid is 16 he’s gonna hate my guts!’ He doesn’t, but he’s conflicted about the picture. He feels that everybody made money off it and he didn’t. I think he deserves something. But it’s always the record labels that make the money.”

Reuters


subscribe